Of course you have a point, and there have been some huge miscarriages of justice in the UK, such as the chap (his name escapes me, sounded eastern European I think, Poland?) who was accused of killing a young girl, DNA proved years later that it was not him, he was released and died a year later.
However, refusing someone bail is not to condemn them, it’s just a safety precaution, I do believe many people are refused bail, often because the judge reckons they’ll do a bunk – this does not mean to say they have been proved guilty.
“Prefer the rightist fascist bollocks perhaps?”
Not at all, I’d prefer that my family are far from harms way.
“How would you feel if your partner was haacked to death by the really guilty party while an innocent suspect was banged up in jail instead?”
If the wrong bloke is in the slam then the real culprit is gonna be out on the lose anyway, what I’m getting at is if someone is arrested, then released on bail only to go and commit a crime, so the crime could have been avoided, right?
“really guilty”
Are there different levels of guilt? A tad guilty, a bit guilty, 50% guilty, really guilty.