These Forums are not in heavy use anymore, I suggest you say up for an account on the main page, Freelance TEFL. It's a social networking TEFL site where you can make your own groups and have your own little place on the TEFL web.

Author Topic: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?  (Read 2321 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Andy

  • Global Moderator
  • TEFLWatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 118
  • Karma: +28/-3
Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« on: December 06, 2006, 10:27:32 am »
Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not? I ain't gonna make this into a poll, I wanna know what you have to say. We got Rate This School and sometime in the next couple of weeks we are comin' out with School Grievance Forms. Do we still need the Hall of Shame or can we do somethin' different?

What do y'all think?


Offline anyonefortennis

  • TEFLWatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
  • Karma: +13/-5
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2006, 11:48:29 am »
I'd do away with it altogether or make some changes at least.

If people feel the site needs a HoS why not replace it with a monthly 'sin bin' - each month put schools that have sinned into the bin for 30/31 days and then run a new one at the end of the month. 

This will help keep the data upto date and relevant, and if a school is wrongly binned (by a grudge holding ex-employee) their sentence will only last for a month. You could keep a record of each months binned schools so that teachers looking for a new gig can check it out. For a school to remain in the bin they must commit a new sin each month, so truely bad schools will be able to have an on going presence in the bin, whilst other not so bad joints will make only fleeting visits.

just a thought.   

Offline Krungsri

  • TEFLWatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: +3/-2
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2006, 01:20:04 pm »
Good compromise suggestion Anyonefortennis, but I would get rid of it altogether.  To sin-bin a player you need a neutral referee who knows the rules.  I don't know if anyone complaining about schools is fully neutral or sufficiently knowledgeable.

If we are looking to assist potential teachers with their job searching, just advise them to look through the various postings about schools that have come up for criticism.  They can make their own minds up or do further investigation.

Offline Andy

  • Global Moderator
  • TEFLWatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 118
  • Karma: +28/-3
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2006, 02:01:45 pm »
That is where me and the mod team comes in, dude. We are all third party observers who take the side of the teacher. If you want a third party observer who takes the side of the schools, look for further than the other forum that claims to represent teachers in Thailand.

 :axechase:

Pibthong

  • Guest
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2006, 04:35:05 pm »
Andy,
   Your reply to Krungsri states precisely why TeflWatch is justified in initiating and continuing the Hall of Shame. One can read from the post of Krungsri, who admits to being an administrator at the Hall of Shame Sarasas Ektra School, how much the owners/managers of Thai schools would love to see TeflWatch dump the Hall 0f Shame.

   The Hall of Shame is a brilliant and excellent idea, as is. The owners of schools in Thailand hate the TeflWatch HofS because it focusus on and exposes Thai owners who are crooks, liars, theives, cheats, swindlers, corrupt and all the rest. Nowhere else can a farang teacher get the effective justice the teacher seeks and deserves against the unscrupulous Thai owner and minions.

   Until we see more input into the Rate This School function and the efficacy of the Grievance Forms, the Hall of Shame needs to remain at TeflWatch and to remain as it is. It is the only place where reckless and uncaring owners can be held accountable and be made to feel the consequences of their misdeeds, misbehaviours and, too often, their malevolence.
   

Mods-Rockers

  • Guest
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2006, 05:41:33 pm »
Well personally I was never in favour of the idea, its open to abuse as others have said and quitefrankey IMHO it serves no purpose as a school could be put there under one clause but be great in all others, also a school admin might change and a school get a whole lot better but nevr get reported here (we see that from the lack of good school postings). The sinbin idea has a lot of merit, a bad school would tend to stay there and it would also have the counter for number of months it has been in the bin (could be two counters, number of consecutive months and another for number of total months) which would be a better indicator of problematic schools.

Offline bluefalang

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: +4/-3
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2006, 06:13:19 pm »
HOS is a great attention getter. tefl teachers and students will ultimately benefit from this short hand method of pointing out the worst of the worst. i say keep the HOS. why diminish the stigma (for the HOS schools) and efficacy (empowering teachers) of labeling abusive, corrupt and shitty schools? calling a spade a spade in the tefl snake pit gives me pleasure every time I see the words "Hall of Shame".  :jumpcig:

Offline Andy

  • Global Moderator
  • TEFLWatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 118
  • Karma: +28/-3
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2006, 07:32:49 pm »
Sinbin is open to abuse as well, teachers who jones to post every month to keep 'em there, any HOS or sinbin or wtf ever requires us third parties to take a stand and shift the shit from shinola.

RTS, when it ain't being abused by a school tosser, can be a good resource to see if a school sucks or not and ain't that what we are trying to do?


Offline Krungsri

  • TEFLWatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: +3/-2
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2006, 08:04:40 pm »
I doubt that HoS causes school owners any loss of sleep if they believe they’re doing the right thing and enrolments are healthy.  Especially where there is no evidence of any more than the normal level of dissatisfaction among staff.  (I’ve worked in organizations for the last 40+ years and can’t think of any where there wasn’t a level of dissatisfaction.  Sure, if you think an institution is breaking the law or acting immorally, tell the world if you want to.  Write in to TEFL Watch! 

My beef with the HoS is not that it has enshrined my school, but that it legitimizes questionable and possibly false accusations.  It also gives a platform to assertions that can be neither verified nor falsified because they are based on personal impressions and interpretations that may be quite idiosyncratic.  Having given credibility to what might just be crankiness, it has placed institutions and the people who work in them in an invidious position.  Should they agree to be defendants, with what that may imply, or do they retreat, leaving the field to those whose strength lies in the tenacity, perhaps obsessiveness, of their grievance, regardless of what merits it may have.

I’m the only one at my school, I think, who continues to participate in the discussion, and that is because I’ve come to see that TEFL Watch can be a good site for reasonable discussion among teachers, including the airing of grievances.  I don’t see, however, why a Hall of Shame, with its Salem-like connotations, benefits teachers who want to know something about schools.  Teachers will benefit from a forum where people can tell it as they see it, but to have reached a verdict without satisfactory evidence, without proper procedure and with key witnesses either uncalled or unheeded is to legitimize a kangaroo court.

Incidentally, I did not “admit to” being an administrator at Sarasas Ektra.  I announced it.  I’ve nothing to hide.  I also have no interest in casting unfair aspersions on the motivation or integrity of others who post to this site.  If I’m way off the mark in what I’ve said I’m sure people will make that clear.  I know the site has an advocacy role, not just endless debating, but it’s motto is also something about truth and justice, so fairness shouldn't be sidelined.

Offline RobRoy

  • TEFLWatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 238
  • Karma: +16/-8
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2006, 09:56:27 pm »
Ok, I disagree with the Hall of Shame for several reasons.....
1.  There is little or no positive news on the website.  So most administrators are looking at what is going wrong, rather than looking at how teachers want to improve things.

2.  Objectivity is important.

3.  Lack of importance....if the only kind of teachers that post puts a school in the hall are the ones that had a problem because of poor paperwork, lack of experience, lack of knowing the difference between a promise to do good for a friend and a contract with others who are trying their best to impersonate professionals.

4.  Just my opinion, I will admit that my testicles and brain are roughly the same size,  but i would suggest that....
a.  take comments from schools and try and inspire posters to show how the school improve

I'm late on my visa, I have to go to Aranya, could you help me get the paperwork together so I don't have to miss my classes...what Thais want to hear

I'm late on my visa, its going to cost me 700 baht to go to Aranya tomorrow and are you going to make sure the Thai teachers are covering my classes because your fucked up on my paperwork again?

Just my understandings...what the fudge do I know

Offline anyonefortennis

  • TEFLWatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
  • Karma: +13/-5
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2006, 03:08:53 pm »
Pibthong, sorry old bean but I cannot agree with much of your last paragraph, you clearly had a rotten experience but I would hazard a guess that it clouds your judgment on this issue - I should think that your experience was the exception rather than the rule, therefore I don’t think the Hall should remain based on your own experiences alone.

You state, and in no uncertain terms, that “The other farang administrators at Sarasas Ektra School (and many other Thai schools) are disreputable characters.”

Given that you have not worked at the school for what, nearly two years, are you qualified to make such a statement? I don’t think so, and this is the main problem with the Hall, how much weight can you give to the words of disgruntled ex-employees who have not worked at the school for a length of time? They may well speak the truth, but it is dated and may well no longer be relevant. You appear hell bent on condemning schools to the dark depths of the Hall for all eternity, quite simply what is the relevance of such action? Is it a way to reap revenge? All it does is help fester a ‘us –v- them’ mentality which does no one any good, teachers, students, administrators, directors – no one.

There are the forums, which can be used by any member to air their grievances, and threads about truly bad schools will attract other teachers with similar experiences, so is there a need for a HoS? Indeed, when the threads are current they are far more prominent than the HoS.

Further, I’m of the opinion that owners give little thought to the HoS, perhaps if more parents used the site they would, or indeed, perhaps with the impending lack of teachers that has been predicted they will change their ways. However, I think we farang would be faced with real hostility if Thai parents did start to read some of the threads of this site, which are involved in a heavy bout of Thai bashing............hardly the way to get the parents on board now is it.
 
IMHO there are a few other problems with the hall of shame

1.   Time issue. Should a school be put into the Hall because of what happened one or two years ago? Six months ago? In my mind no, further, how long does a school remain in the Hall, are they forever damned?
2.   As M-R has already stated the school could be a bit slack in one area but the rest of the school top notch, so should the schools performance be judged purely on the one slack area? Surely a fairer way would be to consider the whole picture, would it not?
3.   Another problem is taking the word of the OP, as the Chinese say - lái shuō shì fēi zhě,bi n shì shì fēi rén  (the one who comes to gossip is them self the doer of such dirty deeds). I have noticed a number of members who have gone onto the site, posted one posting slagging a school off and then disappear never to be heard of again, or post a few comments on the thread, each one getting less creditable than the last and then disappear. Ok most OP’s are indeed saying it straight but we all know this is not always the case, right?
4.   Reasons for entering the HoS. Should a school be put in the hall if they have one bad day? Say for example they have a new payroll clerk, she makes a dogs dinner of the salaries during her first month and everybody ends up getting paid two weeks late, is that Hall material? It’s quite possible that one or more teachers would complain on the site about this, but I don’t think it means they should be punished for it, everyone makes mistakes, yes?
5.   Another issue is that present teachers working at HoS schools could have difficulty finding employment at other schools if the HoS was to become a reference point for employers. “You’ve worked at two HoS schools, I don’t think you’d fit in here”. Unlikely yes, but you never know.
6.   And finally, given the terrible use of English by some posters slagging schools on certain threads, it appears to me that they are doing more good than harm to the school. I can think of two threads in the last week in which the posters have tried to dis the school, but any neutral observer reading the post would think that the school did the right thing getting rid of them.

That is why I think the HoS should be binned.

To finish I have a question, Pibthong stated that;

Hall of Shame schools are hurting (should this be hunting Pibthong?) for foreign staff. Only a Hall of Shame can provide this kind of accountability and consequence that so severely impacts Thai owners”.

Given that all schools are hunting for foreign staff, is there any other way that the HoS can severely impact the school owners, so as to make them change their wicked ways?

If yes, then I may have to reconsider my current stance.

Offline Nemesis

  • Administrator
  • TEFLWatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 247
  • Karma: +15/-1
  • On Troll Patrol
    • My Place
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2006, 06:42:38 pm »
Nothing is without problems. We all lack perfection.

IMHO, where there's smoke, there's fire and that is enough to make any teacher skeptical of working at a school.

IMHO, there always has been a way out of the HOS for a school in it. As far as I know and maybe the other mods can help out on this, no school has ever bothered to contact this site asking for a way out of the Hall of Shame. In fact as far as I know, no school has ever asked to be removed from the Hall of Shame. If a school did, they would be given a series of steps needed to overcome their past mistakes. The policy has always been that a school needs to admit its wrongdoings in the past, come clean if you will and ask how to get out of the Hall of Shame. If they don't care enough to try to get out of the HOS, then they probably don't care as much that they are in the HOS?

For example, BCC needs to do two things to get out of the Hall of Shame. Drop the 10 baht fee to collect a salary and drop the 20,000 baht no runner deposit and as long as they continue to get more positive feedback, they are out of the Hall of Shame.

Why does a school need to be better than other schools to get out of the Hall of Shame? If Andy and the mod team were to remove a school from the Hall of Shame, it would be seen as a quasi-endorsement of the good job the school is doing.  To protect TEFLWatch, I would hope that the TEFLWatch would never remove a school from the Hall of Shame just because it is not as bad as it once was.

As far as I know, there will be changes to the whole concept of the Hall of Shame, but you will have to wait for Andy to comment on that.


Offline RobRoy

  • TEFLWatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 238
  • Karma: +16/-8
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2006, 11:31:33 pm »
Why even bother with a Hall of Shame....since only bad news is usually posted here, just having the schools name on the website qualifies it for the HofS.  I think the Hall should be retired until more positive posts on schools manage to make it posted here.

When there is no objectivity, there is no truth, when we only listen to the bass, we can't hear the precision of the woodwinds....


But what the heck do I know...

Bob

Offline bomha

  • TEFLWatcher
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
  • Karma: +11/-2
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2006, 11:42:35 pm »
Could we put a limit on the time a school is in the Hall of Shame?  One year?  If there is not reason to 'promote it' to a normal status or standing, just downgrade it to "Former Member, Hall of Shame."  Some theologians say that only *confessed* sins are forgiven.  Others say that only *repented* sins are forgiven.

Pibthong

  • Guest
Re: Should we ditch the Hall of Shame or not?
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2006, 06:59:23 pm »
bomha,
   A good basic idea, I think. Wouldn't it also be necessary, then, to indicate that the school never did clear its name during its time in the Hall of Shame? It's your idea so I would leave to you how such an indication might be made.

 

Affiliated With the Better Living Quest