The thing with unions is that they need to represent all of the teachers and union people need to understand that all people have different atitudes and above all motivations.
In order to have any credibility, a teachers association would have to be made up of people who are qualified to do the job and legally permitted to work here. Perhaps the minimum requirement to begin with would be a work permit. If others saw benefit in joining then they could work towards meeting the requirements. Perhaps for individuals who have been "learning on the job" then rather than teaching them to suck eggs in the form of a CELTA, some sort of testing system could be set up and a syllabus published for teachers to cover.
...all people have different atitudes and above all motivations.
Appreciated. Next!
Will you continue to sneer behind the backs of teachers who don't share your youthful exuberance when you set the union ball rolling?
No, I'll say whatever I have to say to their faces. If they can't be arsed then they'll be poorer for it. You get out what you put in.
With 15 years experience you could probably learn a thing or two from him.
Agreed! In fact, one of the innovations that I want to bring about in the context of my own workplace is lesson observations (nothing new but new to us). I am keen to observe this very same teacher as having spoken to him at length, some of his techniques sounded very interesting and I am certain there are things which I could learn from him that would be of benefit. I think you're barking up the wrong tree.
(regardless of whether he is up to speed with all of the latest fads and abbreviations - one could write a book about all of the TEFL world abbreviations in daily use)
It's not a latest fad, CLT has been a cornerstone of MFL teaching for the last 20-30 years and it's one of the things that you are taught as part of CELTA/ TESOL cert course. This is so typical of Thailand, that teachers go about their business in the belief that they know it all and they don't even know the basics. WE ALL NEED TRAINING AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. I am desperate to learn more about my job and I would like to do the Dip TEFL but I do not have 150K. I have explained this to my colleague and I have put a brief explanation about CLT on the network (I did this in my own time to assist my colleague). We can all learn more; we all need to learn more; we can all learn something from each other. Next!
What worries me is the feeling I get that a lot of the pro-union people seem to be in it (at least partly) for seperating "good" and "bad" teachers or "qualified" and "unqualified" teachers. Rather than bringing people together, it seems to me this would have the total opposite effect.
If that is your understanding then you are completely misinterpreting me. I said that we need a starting point.
I am in favour of getting rid of the KS rd degree teachers that spoil it for the rest in Thailand
In terms of those who have absolutely no real interest in education and only teach because they have no other choice - then "yes" that can hardly be encouraged. Nobody enjoys taking the moral high ground but there is a point when the whole thing becomes a joke. That said, I have meant some teachers here who would never have dreamed of being teachers at home and would never have had the opportunity who actually started to get into it and found that they enjoyed it - we can influence them to become better teachers. If they've got the right attitude then they're in - simple! Same as with the students.. it's not just about those that can but those who are willing and those who you need to you to get their attention and trigger their imagination. I got into university with very few qualifications and I made the most of my opportunity and I have always been grateful for this.
but then if I were to be honest I would extrapolate that out fully and get rid of all (including myself) who did not have full teaching credential (PGCE/GTP or the like from elsewhere) from their home country.
Agreed. In fact, to be perfectly lucid, one reason that I do have respect for you as a teacher is that you are committed to your own professional development through further study; however, its horses for courses and in terms of the mean level of education in Thailand, a first degree + some professional qualifications/ training is sufficient in most cases in my opinion. Those who want more can get more (and would naturally want to better their competences - I know I do). At least a WP, this means you are recognised by the state as somebody whose profession is teaching.
As AJ well knows there is a teacher where we work with more MA’s than I have fingers and a PhD yet strangely all his students hate him and want to transfer, ivory towers or what? Do all those bits of paper make him a good teacher, well BS talks and students walk.
Have you seen him teach? Students are fickle and as you yourself have witnessed, many of the students are not up to scratch and on top of this they are spoilt. They have seen teacher after teacher come and go and they are quick to judge. How can you or I make any sort of assessment on how good he may or may not be in the classroom without first seeing it with our own eyes? Of course, we can ascertain whether he is knowledgeable about teaching or not and whether he talks sense (applies logic) or not. In fact, the gentleman in question is himself the first to admit that he is not a teacher nor never has been; he is however a professional linguist and probably believes that considering all that he has learned in his life, he can surely get his head around teaching. What he probably needs then is more classroom experience.
We all need both experience and training and I have never ever stated otherwise. But do not fall into the trap of the playing the popularity game - teaching is not a popularity contest and the students need to be cognizant of such.
AJ you really should try and separate your personal life from what you state here, your (you and the non CLT teacher) hissy fit with each other may well cloud your judgment on this?
It's nothing personal, it was just a good example of what I was talking about; an anacdoetal example. Another is (and I am not mentioning where it came from, past or present) a teacher with responsibility for Academic Writing course telling those assembled that
the very term academic writing was a dumb one since all writing must be correct therefore all writing is academic and so what was the difference? Move over Rover.
Do you want more? How about the case of a top ajarn hiring an unqualified slip of a girl (i.e. no CELTA and spoke unathentic thainglish to her students, replete without unauthentic tenses, structures and pronunciation - ironically one of the most popular teachers at the school) to write the English syllabus. This was by no means a crap school. Strangely enough the end result was a pile of poop - this kind of thing has got to stop.
If I had asked you yesterday to explain Krashen’s monitor function to me and you could not, would it have made you a bad teacher?
No, but if you didn't know what "phonetics" were it would. There is a minimum that everyone should know period or they shouldn't set foot in a classroom, let alone teach for 15 years.
Does knowing a little about such things make me or you a good teacher?
Well it would appear so since there are teachers out there who believe that the only thing you can test students on as part of a language course is grammatical accuracy so perhaps they could do with brushing up (particularly when they are the ones designing courses)! In most cases, fluency is as important as accuracy - I know this myself having done a MFL degree.
Again I think not, but it may lead us down a road towards becoming a better teacher.
Again, you need to know the basics but in general the more you know about teaching the better. That's what training courses are about - someone else takes the time and trouble of deciding what is essential or particularly relevant and what isn't and designs a syllabus around that - you know, much in the same way as we teachers do for our students as opposed to just pushing them into a library and locking the door... genial!!
Would a Union be a good thing for farang teachers?
That's what we are debating. Still, we might just be talking about two very different things since you keep saying "union" whereas I'm using the term "association".
Well there is a union for teaching staff in Thailand and it is open to Farang as well as Thai (so I am informed)
Well I wasn't aware of that, thank you, that's useful. You see! We learn things from each other in a spirit of mutual cooperation - just beautiful!
but ask yourself this questions has it helped the Thai members? Has it made their working conditions better? Has it forced the schools to pay them a decent wage? Correlate your answers to these questions and then extrapolate those answers onto this question:
Time to slit the wrists then. How about I just ignore your negativity and push on regardless. Yep, I think I'll choose option 'B'. Thanks for the concern though.
Would a teachers union benefit its farang members in Thailand? Nuff said!!!!
Says you! But then nobody would be forcing you to join therefore you are free to choose!