I think rating schools good or bad is very subjective because even looking at the voting for best and worst places to work in Thailand shows discrepancies.? You have inlingua which gets the 3rd worst ranking (1 vote behind 2nd place mention-Siam) and an honorable mention in the best.? You have BFITS which is voted worst but also receives enough votes to tie it for 3rd in the best.? It seems to me that a lot of it has to do with the size of the companies (i.e. more clients, more teachers, more votes).
Personally, I have not heard anything nice about inlingua, certainly not enough to make it the best place to work behind British Council.? The most common thing said about inlingua is that they pay extremely low wages and, like Siam, can't really guarantee salaries, wp or long term prospects.? I also have a friend that has worked for BFITS for 4 years now (he just resigned for his 4th year) and says that though they don't pay as much as he would like, they at least have long term plans for teachers that want to stay here, good resources, low teaching hours and decent administration though he says there are persistent communication problems with Thai admin but what company doesn't have that.? Usually these things have less to do with malicious actions than just common incompetence that we all encounter in every aspect of life in our adventures abroad?or should I say what we perceive as incompetence when judged by our native country standards.
With regards to the winner of the best institute/agency, who can compete with British Council?? A government sponsored institute with a massive budget and support structure no other company or school could hope to ever have.
So how do we judge the best or worst?? Obviously from our own personal experiences.? Which means that if I am a qualified individual (in this country it means just have a degree) who is willing to act with some professionalism then I will tend to have good experiences.? On the other hand, if I am a questionably qualified individual that approaches each employment opportunity with suspicion and hostility, then I will reap what I sow.?
Yes, there are questionable practices out there but much of it is us, as teachers, putting our head in the sand and refusing to acknowledge what is told to us in a contract.? We look at contracts and even if we don?t agree with what it says, we sign anyway.? If we don?t understand and feel that it is unclear, we sign anyway.? Then we lament when it doesn?t go the way we interpret it.? In addition, we wonder why the ?system? doesn?t work the way we are used to it working in our home countries.? Well, the fact is we are not in our home countries and we can?t expect the native systems to respond as we would wish.
For the institutes/agencies/schools that manipulate, lie and cheat, they will eventually get what they deserve.? In addition, as professionals we could start to organize and police ourselves as teachers which then would gain the notice and eventually the respect of the systems we work within.? Setting up an association that evaluates its members and certifies their ability to teach would be a nice start to gaining the ability to then demand the same of the industry we represent.? But without collective credibility, we will never be taken seriously.? And to say it isn?t possible in Thailand is just not so.? I am sure the same was said in Japan and South Korea which have simliar informal associations.? It may not be easy but it isn?t impossible.